Self Assessment of Imports and Exports – Board Circular
Subject: Implementation of ‘Self-Assessment’ in Customs.
17-CBEC The Finance Bill, 2011
08.04.2011 stipulates ‘Self-Assessment’
of
(DoR) Customs
duty in respect of
imported and
export goods by
the importer or exporter, as the case may
be. This means that while the responsibility for assessment would be shifted to
the importer / exporter, the Customs officers would have the power to verify
such assessments and make re-assessment, where warranted. The proposed changes
shall become effective immediately from the date of enactment of the Finance
Bill, 2011. It is, therefore, necessary that the new legislative provisions are
carefully studied and applied correctly to ensure that there is no disruption
in the assessment work, and clearance of imported and export goods continues
smoothly.
2. New Section 17
of the Customs Act, 1962 provides for self-assessment of duty on imported and
export goods by the importer or exporter himself by filing a Bill of Entry or
Shipping Bill, as the case may be, in the electronic form (new Section 46 or
50). The importer or exporter at the time of self-assessment will ensure that
he declares the correct classification, applicable rate of duty, value, benefit of exemption notifications claimed, if any, in
respect of the imported / export goods while presenting Bill of Entry or
Shipping Bill. This should not pose any new difficulties since the importers /
exporters and CHAs have been filing these documents containing the required
details regularly in the ICES.
3. Important
changes are also made in Section 46 of the Customs Act, 1962 whereby it has
been made mandatory for the importer to make entry for the imported goods by
presenting a Bill of Entry electronically to the proper officer except for the
cases where it is not feasible to make such entry electronically. While this is
not a new requirement, it provides a legal basis for electronic filing. Where
it is not feasible to file these documents in the System, the concerned Commissioner
can allow filing of Bill of Entry in manual mode by the importer. These Bills
of Entry would continue to be regulated by Bill of Entry (Forms) Regulations,
1976. However, this facility should not be allowed in a routine manner and
Commissioner of Customs should ensure that manual filing of Bill of Entry is
allowed only in genuine and deserving cases. Similarly, on export side also,
Section 50 of the Customs Act, 1962 makes it obligatory for exporters to make
entry of export goods by presenting a Shipping Bill electronically to the
proper officer except for the cases where it is not found feasible to make such
entry electronically. The Commissioner concerned in these cases may allow
manual filing of Shipping Bill. Again, this authority should be exercised
cautiously and only in genuine cases.
4. Under the new
scheme of self-assessment, the Bill of Entry or Shipping Bill that is
self-assessed by importer or exporter, as the case may be, may be subject to
verification with regard to correctness of classification, value, rate of duty,
exemption notification or any other relevant particular having bearing on
correct assessment of duty on imported or export goods. Such verification will
be done selectively on the basis of the output of the Risk Management System
(RMS), which not only provides assured facilitation to those importers having a
good track record of compliance but ensures that on the basis of certain rules,
intervention, etc. high risk consignments are interdicted for detailed
verification before clearance. For the purpose of verification, the proper
officer may order for examination or testing of the imported or export goods.
The proper officer may also require the production of any relevant document or
ask the importer or exporter to furnish any relevant information. Thereafter,
if it is found that self-assessment of duty has not been done correctly by
the importer or exporter, the proper officer may
re-assess the duty. This is without prejudice to any other action that may be
warranted under the Customs Act, 1962. On re-assessment of duty, the proper
officer shall pass a speaking order, if so desired by the importer, within 15
days of re-assessment. This requirement is expected to arise when
the importer or exporter does not agree with re-assessment, which is
different from the original self-assessment. There may be situations when the
proper officer of Customs finds that verification of self-assessment in terms
of section 17 requires testing / further documents / information, and the goods
can not be re-assessed quickly but are required to be
cleared by the importer or exporter on urgent basis. In such cases, provisional
assessment may be done in terms of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, once
the importer or exporter furnishes security as deemed fit by the proper officer
of Customs for differential duty equal to duty provisionally assessed by him
and the duty payable after re-assessment.
5. One of the
salient features of self-assessment scheme is that verification of declarations
and assessment done by the importer or exporter, except for cases wherein a
speaking order has been passed by the proper officer while re-assessing the
duty, can also be done at the premises of the importer or exporter. This
provision will be applicable as a part of an ‘On Site Post Clearance Audit’
(PCA) programme, which is likely to be implemented soon. Suitable legal cover
has been provided vide Section 17 and Section 157 of the Customs Act, 1962. The
programme is being developed and detailed instructions will follow in due
course. Till that time, the current Post Clearance Audit will continue.
6. In cases, where
the importer or exporter is not able to determine the duty liability / make
assessment for any reason, except in cases where examination is requested by the
importer under proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 46, a request shall be
made to the proper officer for assessment of the same under Section 18(a) of
the Customs Act, 1962. In this situation an option is available to the proper
officer of Customs to resort to provisional assessment of duty by asking the
importer / exporter to furnish security as deemed fit by the proper officer for
differential duty equal to duty provisionally assessed and duty finally payable
after assessment. In this regard, it is clarified that importer should not
resort to this provision in a routine manner and it is expected that this would
be done in deserving cases only where importer or exporter is not able to
assess the goods for duty for want of certain information / documents etc. As
far as possible, steps should be taken to provide guidance to importers/
exporters so that they are able to self-assess and file the Bill of Entry. It
should however be made clear that such guidance is not legally binding.
7. Hence, in both
the cases where no self-assessment is done and when self-assessment is done and
reassessment is required under Section 17, the importer or exporter can opt for
provisional assessment of duty by the proper officer of Customs. The difference
is that when no self-assessment is done, the provisional assessment shall get
converted into final assessment and when self-assessment is done, the
provisional assessment shall get converted into re-assessment. Consequential
changes are being made in the Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment)
Regulations, 1963.
8. Bill of Entry
(Electronic Declaration) Regulations, 2011 are being framed in supersession of
the Bill of Entry (Electronic Declaration) Regulations, 1995. Bill of Entry
(Electronic Declaration) Regulations, 2011 shall incorporate changes made vide
Finance Bill, 2011 and mandate self-assessment by the importer or exporter, as
the case may be. While amending the same, requirements of ICES 1.5 shall be
taken into account since the migration to ICES 1.5 in respect of locations
having ICES 1.0 application is almost complete at all major Customs locations.
Similarly, Shipping Bill (Electronic Declaration) Regulations, 2011 are also
being framed in tune with statutory provisions of Sections 17, 18 and 50 of the
Customs Act, 1962. All these proposed changes viz. formulation of Regulations
and amending formats of Bills of Entry / Shipping Bills requires
detailed consultation with DG (Systems). Thus, these changes will take some
time and till then, the existing Regulations and forms shall continue to apply
to the extent these do not conflict with the amended statutory provisions that
come into force from the date of enactment of the Finance Bill, 2011.
9. The
aforementioned changes will come into effect when the Finance Bill is enacted.
Thus, it is clarified that all Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills which have been
presented either electronically or manually before the date of enactment of the
Finance Bill shall be governed by provisions of erstwhile Section 17 or Section
18 of the Customs Act, 1962.
10. Suitable trade
notice / standing order may be issued to guide the trade and industry.
11. Difficulty, if any, faced in
implementation of these instructions may be brought to the notice of the Board
immediately.
F.No.450/26/2011-Cus.IV